Sprawl

The problem of suburban sprawl

The geography of somewhere

In the new suburbs of America every place looks like every other place, or so it seems: Wide arterial roads, chain retail and scattered office buildings, subdivisions, and a regional shopping mall.

Where sprawl still rules

For several years now, many of us have been predicting — or even celebrating — the end of the era of unfettered sprawl. That seems to be mostly true, but not entirely.

The Data is In: Let the heavy lifting begin

We have a lot more isolated, supersized, energy-sucking housing than we want or can afford. And we have a lot less compact, close-in, energy-efficient neighborhoods than we need.

Rural preservation: One more reason to care about cities

Compact development patterns could have dramatically decreased the 41 million acres of rural land that the US lost to development from 1982 to 2007.

Study: 34 million acres of forests threatened by sprawl

As troubling as the trends and forecasts are for forests and farms lost to development, it does not have to be this way.  Market trends favor closer-in, more walkable places.

Drive-to shootings

At the Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut, on December 14, our culture may have hit a new low. Twenty-seven dead, most of them first graders, at a time for celebrating peace and joy.

Traditional cities and towns: Incubators of incompetent children

I live in a traditional town and am surrounded daily by anecdotal evidence reinforcing my cities-are-good-for-kids instincts. But are there aspects of modern life, that my child won’t be prepared for?

Walmart and the quest for a better mousetrap

“I don’t shop at Walmart.” Talk about a loaded phrase. Five simple words, but issue them collectively and you effectively open a Pandora’s Box of suggestion.

A nationwide survey of livability

Reconnecting America has released an impressively comprehensive survey of every metropolitan region in the US measuring a wide range of characteristics related to livability and smart growth. The survey gives grades from A to D in four areas: Living (housing and neighborhoods), working (proximity and access to jobs), moving (walkability and transit), and thriving (health and culture). The survey is not meant as a ranking — nevertheless it is easy to come up with a grade point average for the largest metro areas (see graph above). The only surprise on the list is Los Angeles, which ranks right below New York City and San Francisco, along with Boston and DC. The reason is that LA has a surprising percentage of the population living in higher-density neighborhoods on a street grid. Known for its driving, LA was built as a streetcar city. That bodes well for rail transit, which is being expanded there. The real value of this report, called Are We There Yet?, is in drilling down to data from individual metro areas, where there are many surprises. I did not know that Lincoln, Nebraska, is so livable (4.0 score for regions under 500,000), or that Greensboro, NC, had such problems (1.0 score for regions between 500,000 and 3 million). You might want to check out the grades for your metro area.

A culture warrior defends sprawl

With such a sharp geographical divide, “basic issues like sprawl and land use turn into culture war proxies."

Syndicate content