I’m a little insulted that you attach the “right” to the headline of that article. I’m very conservative — an admitted Rush Limbaugh “dittohead” — yet I support New Urbanism as an alternative to sprawl. I can see where people may be threatened by New Urbanism as far as it appears to be social engineering, but from what I’ve learned, that isn’t what New Urbanism is about. New Urbanism doesn’t threaten to deny anyone the American Dream of owning a home or a car. I believe that the more TNDs that are built and the more the public is exposed to that alternative, the more demand there will be.
The Eleventh Congress for the New Urbanism to be packed with innovative debates, new publications, and spirited conversations.
For the first time, CNU is holding a formal parliamentary member debate on the principles of the Charter of the New Urbanism. The debate, Sunday June 22, at CNU XI, is designed to clarify the meanings of Principles 1 and 4 of the Charter, about patterns of regional growth.
Principle 1 reads, “Metropolitan regions are finite places with geographic boundaries … .
Congress for the New Urbanism celebrates exemplary urbanism.
Whether it’s a new block of Berlin, Germany, a regional plan for the San Francisco Bay Area, or a freeway demolition in Milwaukee, this year’s Charter Award winners have something in common: They are the year’s best examples of New Urbanism.
Over the weekend of April 5 and 6, the jurors deliberated for two full days on the 169 entries from over 100 firms.
Watch out. A national attack on smart growth and New Urbanism is under way — organized by libertarian and free-market ideologues and led by economist Randal O’Toole.
O’Toole, director of the Thoreau Institute in Bandon, Oregon, called together 125 opponents of smart growth for a Feb.
It’s useful to have opponents. They point out your errors, and save you from re-
peating them again and again.
Unfortunately, some of New Urbanism’s and smart growth’s opponents — who gathered in late February for Randal O’Toole’s “Preserving the American Dream” conference in the nation’s capital — indulged in so many gross exaggerations and disingenuous arguments that usable criticisms were hard to come by.
After six years of outstanding service, Poticha moves on.
The Board of Directors of the Congress for the New Ur-
banism announced March 5 that Shelley Poticha, the organization’s Executive Director since 1997, will be resigning as of July 1, 2003. Ms. Poticha is leaving the organization to head the new Center for Transit Oriented Development, a national effort to encourage walkable mixed- use development in transit corridors.
“We are very sorry to see Shelley leave us,” said John Norquist, chair of the CNU’s Board of Directors and mayor of Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
With registration open for the eleventh Congress, The Evolving City: From Ideals to Reality, CNU staff are working overtime to pack this year’s event with new perspectives and to make use of member expertise. The Congress promises to keep the movement at the forefront of the growing effort to reform development and planning.
The keynote speaker on opening night, June 19, will be Dr. Richard Jackson, Director of the National Center for Environmental Health at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta.
Since CNU was founded, the movement has in large part developed in conferences, seminars, summits, and newsletters. But every week, hundreds of urbanists are learning from intense on-line discussions. Electronic resources, both from CNU and from other urbanist allies, are absolutely crucial for ongoing education. Here are some of the best.
The CNU website is one of those places where the more you dig, the more you find.
New Urban News’s annual survey of neighborhood-scale projects finds more new developments than ever.
Neither a slack economy nor talk of war slowed the progress of New Urbanism in 2002, as the number of neighborhood-scale new urban projects in the US jumped 26 percent. Projects that have left the planning stage and are under construction grew by 28 percent.
Since the Charter of the New Urbanism was written, people have argued
about how well development projects fulfill its principles. Homebuyers, investors, and public officials all want to know if a project is real New Urbanism. Various individuals and groups offer checklists, scorecards, and other ways of grading New Urbanism. A number of efforts by CNU members are grappling with creating systems for judging projects.
Each type of emerging certification system embodies a unique perspective and goal.