Protecting small businesses from suburban redevelopment
Montgomery County Executive Isiah Leggett says his administration must do a better job of protecting small businesses during the redevelopment of Wheaton, Maryland, than the county did when downtown Silver Spring was being redeveloped.
Many of the small businesses near the commuter rail and bus hub in Silver Spring “were shoved aside because they could no longer pay the rent or stay in Silver Spring, even though they were there for a long period of time," Leggett said Jan. 17. He said he doesn't want to see that happen in Wheaton, where the county, the Washington Metropolitan Transit Authority, and developer B.F. Saul are teaming up to build 600,000 sq. ft. of office space, 40,000 sq. ft. of retail, a 120-room hotel, and a town square.
Intensive mixed-use development has been taking place near a number of Metro commuter rail stations in the Washington suburbs. This is helping the region to mesh its mass transit and real estate development patterns—shifting away from the energy-wasting, single-use, automobile-oriented patterns of the past.
But as new concentrations of suburban mixed-use development emerge, criticism is beginning to come from those who see existing businesses being shunted aside. The Montgomery Gazette reports that the Coalition for the Fair Redeveloment of Wheaton presented a petition urging the county and B.F. Saul to provide financial aid to small business owners before and during construction.
Many of the small enterprises in the "Wheaton Triangle" are Latino-owned. The Latino Development Corporation is urging that they be protected from rising rents and business lost during construction.
Business owners say they want more detailed information from the county about what will be done for them. By 2019, between $200 million and $300 milliion of redevelopment is expected in Wheaton.
A Washington Post article in November described the affected section of Wheaton as somewhat "junky-looking" but also as "comfortable," with its mix of Asian markets, Latino shops, and other family-owned enterprises serving an ethnically diverse clientele.
For more in-depth coverage on this topic:
• Subscribe to Better! Cities & Towns to read all of the articles (print+online) on implementation of greener, stronger, cities and towns.
• See the October-November 2011 issue of New Urban News (as our print newsletter was known for 15 years). Topics: HUD’s Choice Neighborhoods, Parking reform, transit-oriented parking policy, Obama vs. Congress, West Virginia town revitalizes, suburb remakes its center, ecological dividend, cul-de-sac makeover, thoroughfare manual, and much more.
• Get New Urbanism: Best Practices Guide, packed with more than 800 informative photos, plans, tables, and other illustrations, this book is the best single guide to implementing better cities and towns.
• See the September 2011 issue of New Urban News. Topics: Walk Score, sprawl retrofit, livability grants, Katrina Cottages, how to get a transit village built, parking garages, the shrinking Wal-Mart, Complete Streets legislation, an urban capital fund, and much more.



Comments
Wheaton Maryland Development
Wheaton controversy
Thanks to kenf for the additional information. The blog posting that he refers to, "Lenny Greenberg, dreaming of Wheaton beyond the strip mall," shows a huge range in the character of work that developer Leonard Greenberg has done in Wheaton and Bethesda—from a one-story strip shopping center with parking lot in the front (in Wheaton) to a handsome, 10-story residential building that meets the street in a traditional urban manner (in Bethesda).
The blog points out that two decades ago there was an effort by the county to protect small businesses in Wheaton, but according to some, it hindered development. The blog says:
In 1990, the county passed a plan for downtown Wheaton that instituted a "Retail Overlay Preservation District." (See a map of it here.) The district was supposed to protect small businesses while ensuring that new construction was of high quality. However, by limiting the density of new development and requiring that all new buildings be reviewed by the Planning Board, even ones that complied with the zoning code, it actually repelled investment.