Depressed home prices hurt municipal budgets
"The nation’s housing crisis is five years old, but for local governments across the country, the worst of the reckoning might only now be at hand," The Washington Post reports.
Property taxes collected in Baltimore—$815 million in the most recent fiscal year—are expected to shrink to $803.5 million this year, $773 million in 2013, and $735.7 million in 2014. By 2015, Baltimore will be collecting roughly $85 million less than it did in the last fiscal year, The Post said. That's a drop of a little more than 10 percent. Not until 2016 is the situation there expected to improve.
Because most municipalities reassess properties much less than annually, the effects of the drop in housing values is just starting to affect municipal revenue—a process that will take a few years to run its course.
Though The Post didn't say so, Baltimore may not be the most representative example of what's happening. In recent years, Baltimore, with its thousands of abandoned rowhouses, has been one of the nation's more troubled cities. New York, Washington, and some other cities have fared considerably better. Washington has seen housing values rise in neighborhoods that are in much demand.
But there are quite a few cities—from Cleveland, Ohio, to Fort Myers, Florida, and Las Vegas, Nevada—where abandoned housing has become a problem. And analysts such as Christopher Leinberger at Brookings Institution have argued that some of the worst situations are in outlying suburbs—places where the price of gasoline has further strained household budgets.
The Post didn't sort out the differences between various places carefully, so it's hard to know how the impact on central cities nationally compares with the impact on close-in suburbs and distant suburbs.
It does seem clear, however, that many local governments will have to make large cuts in spending, which will have an impact on livability.
The view from Cleveland
At the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, economist Thomas J. Fitzpatrick IV and research analyst Mary Zenker last month produced a report called "Municipal Finance in the Face of Falling Property Values." In it, they warned that government finances in Cuyahoga County, where Cleveland is located, may be hurt by a property reappraisal scheduled for this year, because many properties have lost value since the previous appraisal.
"The impact has been felt most strongly in Cuyahoga’s central city (Cleveland) and its inner-ring suburbs (those that border Cleveland)," Fitzpatrick and Zenker write. "The outer-ring suburbs have not been hit as hard."
Fitzpatrick and Zenker, using figures from the county auditor, estimate that since 2008, property values have declined by 18 percent in the county. They have dropped by 8 percent in outer-ring suburbs, 31 percent in inner-ring suburbs, and a whopping 48 percent in Cleveland itself.
The authors conclude:
If creative ways to make up for this lack of revenue are not found, local governments may face the undesirable choice of either raising property taxes or reducing funding for essential services. Both actions may make the municipality a less desirable place for new home owners to locate. Weakening housing demand may lead to further declines in property values. In any case, it appears that the dramatic fall in property values across the country will accelerate the financial distress of municipalities in the wake of the Great Recession.





Comments
Welcome to our world
California assesses annually. And as required by Prop 13, unless there is a sale or refinance, taxes can rise no more than 2% annually, regardless of property value or inflation.
Another provision of Prop 13 requires the assessor to revise taxes downward when there is a decline in property values, regardless of whether the property has sold.
So, for example, when I bought my house 10 years ago, the taxes were about 1$1500 and rose when I refinanced, eventually reaching about $1750. When values crashed, the assessor based my house's value on the change in sales price on houses that were selling and the price at last sale. I am currently paying just under $1000/year. At a 2% increase--when increases start again--how long will it take for the state and city to recover to the $1750 I paid just three years ago?
Welcome to a taste of our world, folks. Don't make the same mistakes that California did.
Re: welcome to our world
By my calculation, that would take 30 years or more, Cindy. If there is substantial inflation between now and then, it seems like the price you are paying in taxes could diverge significantly from the value of your property. That could create unfairness relative to what others are paying in taxes and unintended incentives. On other hand, as a homeowner in New York State, I only wish I had a multiple of your tax bill.
Property taxes
Prop 13 and the fate of California
Cwags submits his/her opinion that property taxes should retreat if values do ("That puts more in the pocket ofnthe [sic] tax payer to help the ...economy"), and that California has "no balanced budget requirement," implying that state spending has gotten out of control.
First, Prop 13, passed in 1978, reduced local tax revenues 57% (says Wikipedia), and ended the activist government that brought California schools to the peak of their recent performance. Kids coming from California to the midwest, where I grew up, were a grade level ahead of us. Post-Prop 13, California kids test 44th of 50 states.
The infrastructure and human capital Pat Brown built when California had the money (it had a surplus in 1978) was at the root of the Silicon Valley boom. No such thing is on the horizon now. The state's budget deficit was roughly $24 billion, when last I checked. If it's any consolation, the bonuses alone (no salaries) on Wall Street would have filled this.
Seldom discussed: the gigantic loophole in Prop 13. Business properties are often owned by entities like corporations. You can sell the corporation over several years without triggering a revaluation, so Disneyland gets a free ride, no matter who owns it. More, and more details, <a href="http://www.capitolweekly.net/article.php?_c=10apiigw8ebdw27&xid=ygguk7ppfx5xva">here.</a>
Meanwhile, our taxes on rentiers are at 60-year lows. Property should be taxed at *much* higher rates if we want to revive a productive economy, and not just make the one percent of coupon clippers wealthy.