Skip to Navigation
Logo
Home › News and Opinion › Blogs › How transportation planning kills streets ›

How transportation planning kills streets

Blog post by Robert Steuteville on 08 Feb 2012
  • Streets
  • Walking
Robert Steuteville, Better! Cities & Towns

Since the 1950s, the level of service (LOS) metrics have established an ideal condition for US thoroughfares. Think of a car commercial in northern Arizona with a road leading to the horizon with rock formations on either side (the rock formations are optional).

The opposite, the thing to be avoided at very high cost, is driving with lots of people all around you. That's called congestion.

That makes sense on an Interstate highway, but in a mixed-use downtown — not so much. In fact, there's a technical word for the absense of people in a city or town: Dead.

A far more technical and thorough explanation of why this is bad for cities can be found in Gary Toth's blog on the Project for Public Spaces website. It has some fun images by Andy Singer, which I repost below. The blog compares the use of level of service to weeding a flower garden with a rototiller.

Notice that after elimating the weeds and the congestion, the garden and the city are, respectively, dead.

Worse, Toth explains, the level of service metrics are combined with 20-year projections for the future. This method predicts growth and designs thoroughfares to avoid the dreaded congestion even in the face of the expected development for two decades coming. There's a technical term for a city or town without congestion for 20 years: Ghost town.

Of course, due to the lack of appeal of a community with overwide thoroughfares and a decimated downtown, the projected growth does not come. That's when even the ghosts look for a livelier place.

An alternative would be to create a new grading system that acknowledges that in some places — that is to say cities and towns — people are good. Mobility could be measured not in terms of how few people are around you, but how many choices you have to get from point A to point B. The best choice, really, would be walking a short distance on streets and through public spaces with lots of people all around you — places with life and ... congestion.

For more in-depth coverage on this topic: 

• Subscribe to Better! Cities & Towns to read all of the articles (print+online) on implementation of greener, stronger, cities and towns.

• See the January-February 2012 issue of Better! Cities & Towns. Topics: Value capture and transit, Social networks aid downtown, Live smaller, Rentals are market key, Streetcar inspiration, Box building, Civilizing suburbs, Alley houses, Sprawl repair, Healthy communities, Funding for infrastructure, Chicago River reversal

• Get New Urbanism: Best Practices Guide, packed with more than 800 informative photos, plans, tables, and other illustrations, this book is the best single guide to implementing better cities and towns.

Share
  • Facebook Facebook
  • Twitter Twitter
  • del.icio.us del.icio.us
  • Google Google

Comments

Transportation Planning are bringing streets back to life

Submitted by Rob H (not verified) on Thu, 2012-02-09 15:46.

Dear Mr. Steuteville:

Transportation planning efforts are bringing streets and downtowns back to life. Transportation planning is not killing streets through LOS metrics. The total opposite is occuring in many cities across America, and especially here in Kentucky. The Kentucky Transportation Cabinet and their local highway districts are part of the Transportation Planning Process. Through their engineers and planners's cooperative efforts, the FHWA and other FHWA-related program funds are paying the bills to create a livable and accommodating pedestrian environment. So, lumping everyone into the same group and saying transportation planning kills streets is not true. I have 14 years with the Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government, and I've coordinated transportation planning and project planning, so I know that we're doing all we can and we're making a difference. Millions of dollars have been spent to reconstruct a new and improved streetscape. The LOS metrics aren't the "end all" for making planning decisions anyway; most of the time it's barely given its due so how can this metric be the downfall of cities. It's not.  

The massive amount of Federal-Aid Program dollars coming into cities, counties, MPOs and states should be good reason enough not to be blaming transportation planning. When divided we become weaker, so how about telling the good news; and there is alot of good projects that have come from the transportation planning process and transportation planners. With all due respect, you're off base on this one. I would recommend that you research the many  MPO transportation improvement programs (TIPS)and you'll see the millions of dollars being spent to accommodate pedestrians, cyclists, and transit.

Best regards,

 

Rob Hammons, AICP

 

Re: Transportation planning is bringing streets back to life

Submitted by Robert Steuteville on Thu, 2012-02-09 16:50.

Rob,

Fair enough. You make some very good points. The piece was meant to make fun of some of the metrics used in transportation planning, and the idea that congestion is generally considered to be a bad thing. I overgeneralized to make the point, especially in the headline. No question that many transportation planners are working to improve livability, but they are working within a system that has historically prioritized automobile movement over other modes of transportation and over the quality of the public realm.

It's good to hear that you are working to improve livability in your MPO. Much of what we do highlights positive work in creating and reinforcing mixed-use communities.

Best regards,

Rob

Pro & Con

Submitted by Margie Campaigne (not verified) on Thu, 2012-02-09 22:12.

Very interesting points on both sides! Have you seen the new documentary, "Urbanized"? It addresses this and then some.

Complaining too much

Submitted by Timothy (not verified) on Fri, 2012-02-10 10:05.

I am a non-engineer, and even I am uncomfortable with the constant degradation of a broad yet technically-precise profession that is charged with building the uncontrolled human environment with public dollars. Give engineers a break, there are thousands of very qualified professionals in this field. Their task is one that planners and architechs would NEVER adequately fulfill or even understand completely, and all you do is complain.

With All Due Respect

Submitted by Dennis R. Lieb (not verified) on Fri, 2012-02-10 17:35.

I have no desire to bash any current practitioner that is doing good work in the traffic field. Fact is though, that the wide view of this country confirms it is not the norm. Here in Pennsylvania I have seen practically nothing good that has been completed in the last 30 years...with the possible exception of large city projects, whose planning departments are either exempt from or have somehow figured out how to outwit PennDot regs and bureaucracy.

Not only is the general trend in street design hideous aesthetically and counter-productive socially and economically, but just being allowed to make local decisions outside the heavy hand of state regulation has caused many resource-strapped communities to stop even trying to fight for good projects.

Most states are broke and want to cut budgets. What better way than to return control of local decison making on street design to cities and towns? They were doing it before DOTs even existed (or traffic planners for that matter).

In Easton, where I live, we are told we can't add diagonal parking to one side of a major downtown street with a 50 ft R.O.W. because it will "change the context of the street", which of course is exactly what is needed. Context Sensitive Design may be a fact in some parts of this country...here in PA it is all talking the talk and no walking the walk.

DRL

The Pattern Languages are dead, it's a hopelessness

Submitted by Øyvind Holmstad (not verified) on Mon, 2012-02-13 16:19.

I feel for dropping a quota from Christopher Alexander:

But, by contrast, in the early phases of industrial society which we have experienced recently, the pattern languages die.

Instead of being widely shared, the pattern languages which determine how a town gets made become specialized and private. Roads are built by highway engineers; buildings by architects; parks by planners; hospitals by hospital consultants; schools by educational specialists; gardens by gardeners; tract housing by developers.

The people of the town themselves know hardly any of the languages which these specialists use. And if they want to find out what these languages contain, they can’t, because it is considered professional expertise. The professionals guard their language jealously to make themselves indispensable.

Even within any profession, professional jealousy keeps people from sharing their pattern languages. Architects, like chefs, jealously guard their recipes, so that they can maintain unique style to sell.

The languages start out to being specialized and hidden from the people; and then within the specialties, the languages become more private still, and hidden from another, and fragmented. – The Timeless Way of Building, page 231-232.

  • About us
  • Subscribe
  • Advertise
  • E-updates
  • Cart
  • Browse Topics
    • Academics
    • Affordability
    • Architecture
    • Bicycling
    • Building
    • Civic
    • Codes
    • Community
    • Development
    • Disaster Relief
    • Economy
    • Energy
    • Environment
    • Farm/gardening
    • Finance
    • Funding
    • Global warming
    • Health
    • Highways
    • Humor
    • Infill
    • International
    • Landscape design
    • Landscape Urbanism
    • Law
    • Market trends
    • Mixed-use
    • New Urbanism trend
    • Obituary
    • Parking
    • Planning
    • Policy
    • Public Outreach/Response
    • Public space
    • Region
    • Resort
    • Retail
    • Safety
    • Security
    • Sprawl
    • Sprawl retrofit
    • Streets
    • Traditional neighborhood dev.
    • Transect
    • Transit/transit-oriented dev.
    • Transportation costs
    • Urban design
    • Vehicle miles traveled
    • Walking
    • Workplace
  • Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Log In
  • Home
  • BCT in print
  • Free Sample
    • CNU Update
    • Blogs
    • Discussions
  • Shop
    • Best Practices Guide
    • SmartCode Manual
    • Announcements
    • Directory
  • Topics
    • Places Wiki
    • Images

Events

NCI Charrette Training Registration Open - Portland & DC
Mar 19, 2012 - Oct 31, 2012

MOREPOST

Jobs

Landscape Architect or Urban Designer - 120704
HDR, Inc. | Omaha, NE
Manager of Urban and Long-Range Planning
City of Huntsville | Huntsville, Alabama

MOREPOST

Follow us on
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • Privacy
  • Copyright 2010 New Urban News Publications

PO Box 6515, Ithaca, NY 14851-6515 | tel 607-275-3087

Site development by FreeThought Design.