Subscriber? Log in for full article. Not a subscriber yet? Subscribe to read all articles (print + online delivery) about how to implement better cities and towns. Or, get the April-May 2013 issue (instant pdf download).
Traditional neighborhood developments (TNDs) on greenfield sites, a key part of the New Urbanism 10 to 20 years ago, have had a tough time in recent years. Some have survived and continue to build out, some have gone through foreclosure and bankruptcy, but few new ones have been proposed in recent years.
Real estate analyst Christopher Leinberger contends that greenfield TNDs will not be a big part of the urban real estate revival going forward because of the high levels of investment and risks required to create an urban place from scratch.
On the other hand, new single-family housing is demanded in walkable neighborhoods — a demand that is hard to meet through infill development alone. The three projects — in Richardson and Fort Worth, Texas, and Clovis, New Mexico — profiled in the accompanying article are all new, greenfield developments on the scale of a neighborhood or several neighborhoods.
When developers build such projects they will most likely have to confront issues that were not dealt with in TNDs prior to the housing crash. One is minimizing investment and risk — and that probably means more efficient layouts built in smaller increments. The Saddlewood plan by Vialta Group is a good