Redevelopment plan presented for historic Port-au-Prince

  • Palace area rendering

    Palace area rendering

    Courtesy of The Prince's Foundation and Duany Plater-Zyberk & Company

  • Illustrative plan

    Illustrative plan

    For Port-au-Prince. Courtesy of The Prince's Foundation and Duany Plater-Zyberk & Company

  • 'Urban village' with corner park

    'Urban village' with corner park

    For Port-au-Prince. Courtesy of The Prince's Foundation and Duany Plater-Zyberk & Company

  • Urban village blocks

    Urban village blocks

    For Port-au-Prince. Courtesy of The Prince's Foundation and Duany Plater-Zyberk & Company

  • New retail areas

    New retail areas

    For Port-au-Prince. Courtesy of The Prince's Foundation and Duany Plater-Zyberk & Company

  • Port terminal

    Port terminal

    For Port-au-Prince. Courtesy of The Prince's Foundation and Duany Plater-Zyberk & Company

  • Waterfront scenario

    Waterfront scenario

    For Port-au-Prince. Courtesy of The Prince's Foundation and Duany Plater-Zyberk & Company

Author: 
Robert Steuteville
New Urban Network

A plan was unveiled January 25 to reconstruct the historic city center of Port-au-Prince with a better urban environment than existed prior to the devastating January 2010 earthquake. The Haitian government commissioned The Prince’s Foundation for the Built Environment of London, England, and Miami-based Duany Plater-Zyberk (DPZ) to develop the plan.

The plan envisions a rebuilt government center around the presidential palace with civic/administrative buildings, museums, concert halls, schools and green spaces. A form-based code aims to ensure that new buildings are designed with pedestrian-friendly frontages. The historic street grid is retained with new small parks on street corners that “come together to form complete squares of tremendous elegance,” explains planner and architect Andres Duany.

A rebuilt waterfront would include mangrove trees to protect against storms. The plan calls for building housing on top of rubble. The team calculated that if the rubble from the demolished buildings is used as a base for new buildings it would raise them up 80 centimeters — more than two and a half feet — enough to protect against a 100-year flood, Duany says. The water is then channeled into streets and would not affect the houses or the parking.

The planners focused on how middle-class and wealthy residents can be lured back into the urban environment — which is the only way that a proper rebuilding can be “amortized,” Duany explains.

“The people who have to rebuild require three things — security, parking, and a predictable environment,” he says. Toward those goals, the plan proposes a sub-governmental level of management at the scale of the urban block. Each residential block, dubbed by the team an “urban village,” would be designed to provide its own utilities and parking at the center of the block.

A structure at the block center would provide dependable electricity, water, and sewer, Duany explains, surrounded by a common parking area accessible by alleys. The central block would be watched over by residents, all of whom have a personal stake in security. The utilities and parking would be owned in the form of a cooperative or condominium.

The generous size of the historic Port-au-Prince blocks provides space for central infrastructure and parking while allowing some private space for residents. Many of the blocks could be designed with neighborhood greens at the corners. “We expect every block to have a park,” Duany says. “So in fact every view has trees.” He adds: “This is the virtue of your large blocks — only a large block can tolerate including a park on the corner.”

The architecture of new buildings would be based on local precedent, the planners say.

The team envisions initial development of 1- to 2-story buildings, which was the condition of the downtown prior to the earthquake — “so there is no reason to think that after the earthquake it will be four stories,” Duany explains. However, it could evolve to four stories over time, he says. The form-based code will ensure good urbanism even at a low height, he explains. If the government were to adopt no plan, some tall buildings would be constructed, but the rest of the land would have no value for redevelopment. “It does have vitality — it has the vitality of Haiti — but you will not have urbanism, which, by the way, people love,” he says.

The plan identified three possible levels of regulation. The minimum would be a form-based regulation of building frontages — but property owners can do whatever they want in the back. There would be no parking and a probable disorganized mess of mid-block buildings, but there would be urbanism in front. The second level would create collective mid-block infrastructure, but no parking. The third level would offer collective infrastructure and parking — 1 car per unit.

Traffic-calming measures such as small roundabouts on the corners would help to keep traffic flowing at a pace that is not disruptive of pedestrians. The plan looks at options for transit, including a bus loop, a streetcar loop, and/or bus rapid transit. “You do have a problem with congestion — but it creates a level of driving skill that I have never seen in America,” Duany told the crowd, prompting laughter.

In addition to government administration, tourism could be a source of employment, Duany says. Essential to that occurring would be developing a retail-oriented quarter near the port with small, pedestrian-scale blocks, Duany explains.

Comments

What about the rest of the people?

I really really hope that there is planning going on for safe earthquake-resistant housing for the poor, for services for shanty towns, for accessible parks and schools, for reliable water, sewer and eelctricity, for open spaces rather than buildings on flood-prone lands, and for the types of bus rapid transit that Latin America is prioritizing. 

 

While there are some good ideas covered in this article, creating secure urban blocks, with their own utility systems immune to urban blackouts, as compounds for the rich downtown is hardly progressive.  In much of the world the rich already live downtown!  A form based code is hardly the main thing Haiti needs ...

There has been a great deal

There has been a great deal of planning focused on the poor in Haiti, or the entire country (which is mostly poor).

Here are two links:

http://newurbannetwork.com/article/miami-hosts-haiti-reconstruction-charrette

and

http://newurbannetwork.com/article/haiti-get-prefab-housing-communities

This particular charrette focused on the historic city center only, an area of about a square mile that will include most of the government administration and therefore will have a lot of middle class employment.

Thanks for the references!

Thanks for the references!

Nice but not for mayority

The blocks are designed for rich and middle class, shouldnt there be more planning for the poor which are actually the one that cause all the city troubles.

 

Ok middle class and rich people rapidly will acquire theses blocks and retain all good urban area,  leaving no access to poor good city homes sites.

The green area in blocks seems a good idea to distract from the undesirable surrounding area and increase some land value, but the concept seems a little restrictive for the creation of big buildings and small retailer services. I think they should be blocks concetrating financial, hotel, office districts near the port and in the middle of the city to prevent traffic congestion .

 

I dont think high rise building would be a solution for massive housing, instead a midlle buidling type apartments will be better with false increase land value environment will provide a nice city facade and savings for the households  in maintenance until they can afford better housing solutions. 

 

Well this are my toughts, every urbanists have different points of view

What history?

I was very excited to see that the redevelopment plans of Port-au-Prince after the earthquake was on the go… I felt that things were finally moving following such tragic event amid the recovery both physical and emotional of the People of Haiti.

 However, after reading this article and the logic behind the plans concepts, I felt uneasy, and helpless knowing that, once again, the people (along with their culture) were not included (or thought of) in the planning concepts. 

Although a great plan, I don't believe the design concept will work.  For one, the concept of apartment is not necessarily a wide spread concept (at least for those who lived in that neighborhood prior to the earthquake); and second of all, you do not give Haitians "Alley ways", they do very bad with them.  They are called "corridors" in the country... and Mr. Duany should know this, having done his research of the "Haitian culture" prior to planning.  Mainly because, not too far from where he's proposing his plan, there is a prime example of what Haitians do with "corridors".  His idealistic views of the culture are unfortunately tainted... Not all islands are the same... No two places are alike… and what works for one place and seems to be a great concept for some place does not necessarily guaranty the success, elsewhere.

The plans mentioned “Historic Port-au-Prince...”, what history and which Port-au-Prince are they referring to? A map, some post cards and photos would have been very helpful of what the city looked like before the disaster (way back when) prior to conceptualized the plans.

From what I can see, in the plans (photos provided), it looks totally different and lost the historic character that made the National Square (which housed the National Palace -the Haitian of The White House) what it was.  The Square was design much like DC with main streets radiating from it into the City of Port-au-Prince.  The National Palace was surrounded by 6 or 7 "places" (what we refer to as pedestrian parks- believe it or not similar to Lincoln Park in Miami Beach, but much less sophisticated).  Off of those parks were located the Civic buildings (each one facing a park), the National Museum, at least 2 major theaters (a movie and a theatrical one, from what I can recall off the top of my head), and a line of commercial spaces linking them to each other.

Because each Civic Buildings faced a pedestrian park, they each served as a radial point to other neighborhood of the city, including the University Center.  It was a mixed used component, which kept "downtown" live and vibrant at night.

The housing prototype chosen will work better in the northern region of Haiti (Cap-Haitien), where the concept of Neighborhood block is not new.  The historic block and houses were build by Frenchmen and resemble a whole lot like European squares.  Port-au-Prince is a whole different ball game.  I give it to Mr. Duany that a form base code and the 1 to 2 stories will work. As it is what it was historically.

It is painful to see that, either way I look at it, Haitians will be at the burnt end with no identity (or a new one).  They take the plan, they lose what once was (of which only remained was left due to bad government decisions, and the lack of care of the then existing conditions).  They don't take it, in the international eyes, it will look as if they don't know what's "great".  Since it's all being funded by the US (donations), I guess the Haitian government will just have to take it, and swallow it.  It's not like they've done anything to prove that THEY can do better...

With all due respect to Mr. Duany, and to the English firm who is part of the redevelopment planning team, I'm not saying that the conceptual plans are wide of the mark, what I'm saying that it is wide of the mark for Port-au-Prince, Haiti…  And if this is how the plans will remain, please let them show at least the historical character of the city, some history of the people living there.