Debate intensifies over bike-ped issues
Subscriber? Log in for full article. Not a subscriber yet? Subscribe to read all articles (print + online delivery) about how to implement better cities and towns. Or, get the July-August 2011 issue (instant pdf download).
Disagreement over how to make communities more bike-friendly — without detracting from pedestrian life — cropped up in June when more than 1,100 people gathered for CNU’s 19th annual congress.
“CNU is 10 years behind on bikeway planning and design,” Mike Lydon, principal in the Street Plans Collaborative, declared during the June 1-4 gathering in Madison, Wisconsin. “Bikeway design is a rapidly advancing field,” Lydon emphasized, and he urged new urbanists to become much better versed in it.
DeWayne Carver, a planner with Hall Planning & Engineering in Tallahassee, Florida, responded with skepticism to some methods proposed by bike advocates. In particular, the idea of laying out new communities with roads that are wider — to accommodate bike lanes — may make those corridors less comfortable for pedestrians, Carver warned.
Biking was the focus of five separate sessions in the congress, reflecting the rapid growth of bike initiatives around the country. Cities from New York to Portland, Oregon, are installing “cycle tracks,” “bike boulevards,” and other facilities aimed at increasing the number of people traveling on two (non-motorized) wheels. Yet Lydon, in his CNU presentation and in later elaboration for New Urban News, said many
...
Subscriber? Log in for full article. Not a subscriber yet? Subscribe to read all articles (print + online delivery) about how to implement better cities and towns. Or, get the July-August 2011 issue (instant pdf download).



Comments
Bike Box
I believe you mean "bike box," not "bicycle block."
Sharrows are fine, but they
Sharrows are fine, but they work best where the street is already narrow, and traffic naturally moves at 15-20 mph. They don't work well on wide streets with high speed traffic.